Crystal methamphetamine!
Naturally, this is a veritas post.
Just look at those nice shards of methamphetamine! I aquired some of this quality meth today, er...I mean last year. ;) It has all been consumed so it doesn't matter when I got it, because it's not in my possession now. Now that the disclaimer is done with, let me proceed with the test results. I haven't seen nice shards of crystal meth in a long time, so this is a real treat indeed. =D
Marquis:
A single shard *pounds heart with fist* was placed on a surface and a drop of Marquis reagent was added. The reaction was a fast one, bubbling and fizzing to an orange color. Orange indicates an amphetamine type substance.
Simons:
Another shard *more pounding* was tested with two drops of Simons reagent and two drops of buffer solution. The color change was very fast to dark blue, it saturated the solution. Blue indicates a secondary amine, so together with the Marquis result, it is safe to assume that the shards of clear crystal is not sugar (or another inert substance) but methamphetamine. :)
If you didn't get the heart pounding reference, it's a feature of slapstick comedies when something shocking (usually financially related i.e. a wasteful act) is done at the disapproval of the person involved. This is presumably an attempt to get the heart beating again after the shocking deed resulted in a cardiac arrest. I have taken the shards to the "taste test" (or rather insufflating test) and the conclusion is that this is Damn Good Methamphetamine or D.G.M. for short.
I am prepared for the final exams...are you? ;)
Ethical question:
Do you think it is "unfair" (cheating) to have a line of meth (or another stimulant) before taking an exam? Please comment. Your input is appreciated.
Personally, I don't think so, because even though it affords extra concentration, increased memory retrieval and (qualitatively) improves thought processes, it's no different from caffeine - which a lot of people take before exams. What makes caffeine acceptable, but not methamphetamine? The legal status? The availability? Different people have different mental abilities too...are the smarter ones "cheating"? Are exams really a fair and equal environment to evaluate understanding of course material? Does being born with a gift (above average intellectual ability) make things "okay" but not taking something to increase performance? Is the perceived advantage given by certain substances (in a non-competitive sporting event) wrong? How does this fit in with drinking coffee, eating a meal and the other things people do to improve performance in exams?
Leave a comment